Communication Ethics book part for Retail Distribution Networks. (This is an automatically generated summary to avoid having huge posts on this page. Click through to read this post.)
Communication Ethics book part for Radio and Television. (This is an automatically generated summary to avoid having huge posts on this page. Click through to read this post.)
Communication Ethics book part for Postal Service. (This is an automatically generated summary to avoid having huge posts on this page. Click through to read this post.)
Communication Ethics book part for Gutenberg: Books, Magazines, Newspapers. (This is an automatically generated summary to avoid having huge posts on this page. Click through to read this post.)
Communication Ethics book part for Hand Copying. (This is an automatically generated summary to avoid having huge posts on this page. Click through to read this post.)
Communication Ethics book part for Historical Overview of Information Transmission. (This is an automatically generated summary to avoid having huge posts on this page. Click through to read this post.)
Communication Ethics book part for Definition of Information. (This is an automatically generated summary to avoid having huge posts on this page. Click through to read this post.)
Communication Ethics book part for The Conventional View of Communications. (This is an automatically generated summary to avoid having huge posts on this page. Click through to read this post.)
I can't believe the number of searches for "What does spam stand for" I'm getting to my Spam Filtering's Last Stand piece. Hopefully this entry will override that one once this is indexed.
Apparently Google has nominated me to answer this question, so: "Spam" doesn't stand for anything. It's not an acronym. SPAMTM is the name of a meat product by Hormel. Spam came to mean "junk email" by analogy to a Monty Python's Flying Circus skit, wherein a restaurant's good food is drowned out by the spam, much like good content is drowned by spam on the Internet.
iRights was formed in January 2000 to track legal issues on the Internet. I was interested in these issues after spending the previous year in Third Voice anti-advocacy, and after studying the relevant law on censorship and such, I realized that nobody really knew how legal Third Voice was. Not only that, but there wasn't even a legal theory adequate to describe the situation as it truly was. A lot of metaphors were tossed about, but they all failed to capture vital aspects of the situation, even the metaphors I made.